The $31,800 question. Do you need a Realtor?

In the NAR blog they recently posted that the Cost of Selling without a Realtor is an average of $31,800. Based on the latest 2005 NAR Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers. This is based on the national average home price and the survey number indicating a 16% gain in price by using a Realtor.

“The median home price for sellers who use an agent is 16.0 percent higher than a home sold directly by an owner; $230,000 vs. $198,200; there were no significant differences between the types of homes sold.”

I would love to know exactly how did they come up with these numbers? Moreover, as a follow up, another great study would be to measure the difference between Flat Fee MLS listed homes, and the average price gain on a home that is listed with a full service broker. Do full service brokers make a difference, or is it merely the marketing magic of the MLS that make this price gain possible?

3 Responses to “The $31,800 question. Do you need a Realtor?”

  1. Brian Says:

    Its all in the hand holding, Thats what everyone gets paid for!!!!!

  2. Flat Fee MLS Marketing Says:

    Yes, I think that is an important study, though I am not sure that they included minimum service flat fee MLS listings, as it appeared to be focused on limited service listings, though I could be mistaken. Regardless, I discussed the study here: http://www.flatfeemlsmarketing.com/so-what-is-a-realtor-really-worth/

  3. Ken Says:

    A study was done by the Texas A & M Real Estate Center of 40,000 or so transactions and found that listings handled by flat fee or discount brokerages sold for 1.7% less and took 17% longer to sell.

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image